Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Shree Sai Chemical

Hindustan Unilever Ltd v Sarthak Soap Industries 911-nmsl2451-16.doc SHEPHALI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 842 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2451 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

Shree Sai Chemical ...Defendant Ms. Akshata Kamath, a/w Ms. Niyati Davawala, i/b W.S. Kane & Co., for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Proprietor of the Defendant, present. Mr. M. S. Deshpande, Court Receiver, present. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

27th September 2016 PC:- 1.

Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Proprietor of the Defendant, who is personally present in Court, submits to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Ms. Kamath, therefore, does not press the prayer for damages.

2.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

27th September 2016

Hindustan Unilever Ltd v Sarthak Soap Industries 911-nmsl2451-16.doc 3.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks. The Plaintiffs' representatives may remain present at the time if they so desire. If the Plaintiffs' representatives are not present, the Defendant will file an Affidavit of compliance within a period of sixteen weeks from today.

4.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

5.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 2451 of 2016 does not survive and is disposed accordingly.

6.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 27th September 2016