← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2810/2019disposed off

Subhash Velji Chawda And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And 3 ORS

2019-12-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar2 pages

20-WP2810-19.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2810 OF 2019 Subhash V. Chawda & anr

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Vincent X. D'Silva, for the Petitioners.

Ms. Geeta R. Shastri, AGP, a/w Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP, for Respondent nos.1 and 2/State.

Mrs. Jyotsna Pandhi, for Respondent no.3.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

5th DECEMBER, 2019 PC:- 1.

Heard Mr. D'silva, the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2.

The challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the City Survey Offcer on 16th July, 2019, whereby the name of respondent no.3 was directed to be mutated to the subject premises by deleting the entry effected, vide Mutation Entry No.1782 of 2019, dated 2nd January, 2019. It is not disputed that the impugned order is susceptible to an appeal before the statutory authority.

3.

Faced with aforesaid situation, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to fle an appropriate proceedings before the appellate authority and agitate the legality, propriety and correctness of the impugned 1/2

20-WP2810-19.DOC order. The learned Counsel further submits that having regard to the fact that the slum redevelopment project is adversely affected by the impugned order, the appellate authority be directed to dispose of the proceedings which would be instituted, within a time frame.

4.

The prayer seems reasonable. Hence, the following order. (i) The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to fle an appropriate proceedings before the Superintendent of Land Records, Mumbai, Suburban district. (ii) In the event, the petitioner fles such a proceedings/appeal, the appellate authority shall dispose of the proceedings/appeal within three months of its institution.

(iii) It is hereby made clear that this Court has not considered the merits of the matter and all contentions of all the parties are kept open for consideration by the appellate authority.

The petition stands disposed of.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2