Sopan D Patil v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle -2 (1) And Another

57 NMA 810-19.doc DDR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.810 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1824 OF 2019 Sopan D. Patil ... Applicant In the matter of - Sopan D. Patil ... Appellant Vs.

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2(1) and Anr.

... Respondents ...........

Ms. Neha Paranjape i/b. Mr. Mr. S.K. Pandey for the Applicant. Mr. Sham Walve a/w. Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for respondents ...........

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 18 DECEMBER 2019 P.C.:- Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Perused the Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. Having gone through the Affidavit wherein reason is given by the Applicant, an individual, of his ill health, we find that sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 62 days in filing the Appeal. Accordingly, Notice of Motion is allowed. Delay in filing the Appeal stands condoned.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Digitally signed by Diksha Rane Date:

2019.12.19 17:18:27 +0530 1/1 Diksha Rane