Mohammed Rafiq Jafferbhai Bagwan v. Sathyaprakash Subramaniam And 2 ORS

1/2 902.CAAL-15-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.15 OF 2018 IN COMPANY APPEAL NO.62 OF 2015 IN CLB COMPANY PETITION NO.34 OF 2012 Mohammed Rafiq Jafferbhai Bagwan ....Applicant Vs.

Sathyaprakash Subramaniam and Ors.

....Respondents ---- Mr. Mohd. Rafiq Jafferbhai Bagwan, applicant/appellant in COAPP/62/ 2015 appeared in person.

Ms. Amrita Saldanha for respondents.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 10th AUGUST 2018 P.C.:

After the Court reserved the matter for judgment, appellant in company appeal no.62 of 2015 took out a company application to reopen the case effectively and hear appellant though on the date when the appeal was reserved for judgment, the counsel refused to go on with the matter. In the interest of justice, the application was heard today. Appellant was present in person and tendered written submissions, which has been taken on record. Appellant is happy with the Court taking the written submissions on record. Ms. Saldanha, counsel for respondents states that they have been given a copy of the written submissions and should be given liberty to Gauri Gaekwad

2/2 902.CAAL-15-2018.doc file a response written submissions, if advised. Ms. Saldanha is justified in seeking time to file a response written submissions. The same to be filed by 20th August 2018.

Application accordingly stands disposed.

Digitally signed by Gauri Amit Gaekwad Date:

2018.08.14 11:14:20 +0530 Gauri Amit Gaekwad (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad