← Library
Bombay High CourtSS/1068/2015consent term

Anil Agencies v. Aditya Agro Tech And 3 ORS.

2016-10-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

SS1068.15-13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1068 OF 2015 Anil Agencies ....Plaintiff V/s.

Aditya Agro Tech and Ors.

....Defendants WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.30 OF 2016 ---- Mr.K.P.Shah for plaintiff.

Mr.Anil Shah-sole proprietor of plaintiff is present. Dr.Suneet Gupta for defendants.

Mr.Prakash Waghmare-defendant no.3 present in Court. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 24.10.2016 P.C.:- The counsel for the plaintiff at the outset, states that name of defendant no.4 be struck off. Leave to amend the plaint granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

The counsel for the plaintiff and the defendants state that the parties have amicably settled the matter and tender the consent terms. The consent terms signed by the plaintiff and defendant no.3 for himself and on behalf of defendant nos.1 & 2 is taken on record and marked `X' for identification.

KJ

SS1068.15-13 The counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff is present in Court and identifies him. The counsel for the defendants states that defendant no.3 is present in Court and identifies him. Order in terms of consent terms. Undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted and so ordered.

Suit dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees if any, in accordance with Rules.

Review Petition No.30 of 2016 dismissed as withdrawn. (K.R.SHRIRAM,J) KJ