Ramesh Mahadeo Korgaonkar v. Sneha Arvind Korgaonkar

*1*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGES ORDER NO.220 OF 2015 IN GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.177 OF 2005 Ramesh Mahadeo Korgaonkar

...Petitioner

V/s.

Sneha Arvind Korgaonkar

...Respondent

........

Mr. Vasant Dhawan, Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner. ........

CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.

DATE : 4TH JANUARY, 2016.

P.C.:

Judges order is listed for 'Speaking to the Minutes' today. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that in the Judge's Order signed on 2.9.2015 by the learned Chamber Judge, on Page 3, 10th line, the name of Anish Arvind Korgaonkar should in fact have been mentioned as 'Sneha Arvind Korgaonkar', who is applicant and Deponent in Affidavit-inSupport dated 22.1.2015. The learned counsel submits that name of Anish Arvind Korgaonkar has crept in inadvertently since similar Judges Order was moved being Judges Order No.219 of 2015 wherein Anish Arvind Korgaonkar was the Applicant. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner

*2* states that he has already applied for certified copy and obtained certified copy of the Judge's Order dated 2.9.2015.

2.

Having heard counsel and perused the petition, I find that the correction is required to be permitted in the interests of justice. I therefore pass the following Order;

(i) In the Judge's Order dated 2.9.2015 place of the name "Anish Arvind Korgaonkar" appearing in 10th line at Page 3, the name of "Sneha Arvind Korgaonkar" shall be substituted. (ii) It is directed that unless the certified copy of the Judge's Order dated 2.9.2015 filed with the Accounts Office is returned for cancellation, no copy of the Judge's Order as corrected today shall be issued.

(iii) The copy of this Order shall not be uploaded till the certified copy issued is returned as directed in (ii) above Praecipe stands disposed of accordingly.

(A. K. MENON, J.)

*3*