The Commissione Rof Central Excise-Thane-Ii v. M/S Magnum Chemical And ANR

suresh 2-CEXA-236.2007.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.236 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II Commissionerate .... Appellant Vs.

M/s. Magnum Chemical & Anr.

.... Respondents Mr. Sham V. Walve for the Appellant.

None for the Respondents.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 08, 2016 P.C:

1.

Mr. Walve, on instructions, states that the Revenue may be allowed to withdraw this appeal.

2.

It is withdrawn in the light of the Circular issued by the Revenue which determines the limit of monetary sums or the sum above which alone the appeals of the Revenue are to be pressed. Every appeal involving a sum mentioned below this limit would not be pressed and on the Revenue's request the Court may dismiss it as withdrawn.

suresh 2-CEXA-236.2007.doc 3.

We have found that the Revenue is withdrawing the appeal though admitted on substantial question of law. It is for the Revenue to decide and withdraw the appeal based on its Circular, but we clarify that we have expressed no opinion on the question of law nor on the legality and validity of the Circular.

4.

By clarifying as above, this appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of as such.

(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)