Rolland Richard Mathews And ANR v. The Hongkong And Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd And 4 ORS

909 wpl2675-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2675 OF 2018 Rolland Richard Mathews and Anr.

.. Petitioners V/s.

The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

.. Respondents Ms.Reena Richard, petitioner no.2, present in person Mr.Kunal Chheda i/b M/s.M.V.Kini and Co. for the respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.R.J.Mane, A.G.P. for the respondent no.5 / State

CORAM:

K.K. TATED & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATED :

AUGUST 29, 2018 P.C. :

Heard Petitioner party in person.

By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 09.02.2017 passed by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai in Case No.284/SA/2015 under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002. As the Mohite 1/2 Trusha Tushar Mohite by Trusha Tushar Mohite Date:

2018.08.31 16:59:40 +0530

909 wpl2675-18.doc alternate remedy is available to the Petitioner under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 under section 17, Writ Petition stands dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to file appropriate Application before the DRT. Respondents are directed not to take any coercive action against the Petitioner till 12.09.2018.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2