← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMAP/417/2018dismissed

Pujit Aggarwal v. Vardhaman Developers Ltd.

2018-09-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar2 pages

Chittewan 1/2 COMMAPAL 361-18-Order.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL APPEAL (L) NO.361 OF 2018 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO.495 OF 2018 IN COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO.673 OF 2018 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.345 OF 2015 ALONGWITH COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.804 OF 2018 Pujit Ravikiran Aggarwal And Others ...

Appellants

Versus

Vardhman Developers Ltd And Others ...

Respondents .....

Mr. Chirag Balsara a/w Mr. Chinmaya Acharya & Mr. Sumit Phatale for Appellants.

Ms. Kausar Banatwala & Ms. Gauri Sakhardande i/b Tushar Garodia for Respondent No.1.

.....

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 P. C. :

At this stage, learned Counsel for the Appellants submits that the Appellants intend to challenge this order. They, in the circumstances, have prayed for stay of operation of the order for the period of four weeks from today. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 opposed this prayer.

Chittewan 2/2 COMMAPAL 361-18-Order.doc 2.

Having considered the circumstances and the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, we direct that for the period of three weeks, interim order passed earlier shall continue. [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]