← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2680/2021disposed at admission stage

Manisha Tulsiani v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2021-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar2 pages

904-OSWP-2680-2021.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2680 OF 2021 Manisha Tulsiani

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr

...Respondents

Mr Karl Tamboly, with Ajay Vazirani & Ameya Deosthale, i/b Lexicon Law Partners, for the Petitioner.

Mr Anil D'Souza, i/b Abhijeet Shinde, Nitin Waghmare & Geetanjali Pawar, for the Respondent.

CORAM

G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ.

DATED:

8th December 2021 PC:- 1.

Advocates tender signed Consent Minutes of the Order. SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE These are signed by the authorized signatory of the 2nd Respondent SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2021.12.15 12:27:17 +0530 and by the Petitioner as also by their respective Advocates. These Consent Minutes of the Order are taken on record and marked "X1" for identification with today's date.

2.

There is also a letter or delegation of authority by the 2nd Respondent accompanied by a certified true copy of a resolution of the board of directors of the 2nd Respondent. The authority 8th December 2021

904-OSWP-2680-2021.DOC documents are taken on record and marked "X2" for identification collectively with today's date.

3.

All undertakings in the Consent Minutes of the Order are accepted as undertakings to Court.

4.

The Petition is disposed of with an order in terms of the Consent Minutes.

5.

A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter.

6.

The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Minutes of the Order is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.

7.

We list the matter on 4th May 2022 for compliance. 8.

of this order.

(Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J) 8th December 2021