← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMAP/391/2018dismissed

Gunjan Pujit Aggarwal v. Vardhman Developers Limited And 3 ORS

2018-09-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar2 pages

Chittewan 1/2 COMMAPL 363-18-Order.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL APPEAL (L) NO.363 OF 2018 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO.763 OF 2018 IN COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO.988 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO.345 OF 2015 ALONGWITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.807 OF 2018 Gunjan Pujit Aggarwal ...

Applicant/Appellant

Versus

Vardhmaan Developers Ltd And Others ...

Respondents.

.....

Mr. Chirag Balsara a/w Mr. Chinmaya Acharya & Mr. Sumit Phatale for Appellants.

Ms. Kausar Banatwala & Ms. Gauri Sakhardande i/b Tushar Garodia for Respondent No.1.

.....

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 P. C. :

At this stage, learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant intends to challenge this order. They, in the circumstances, have prayed for stay of operation of the order for the period of four weeks from today. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 opposed this prayer.

Chittewan 2/2 COMMAPL 363-18-Order.doc 2.

Having considered the circumstances and the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, we direct that for the period of three weeks, interim order passed earlier shall continue. [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]