← Library
Bombay High CourtTS/98/2011consent term

Dinesh Mulchand Kansara And ORS. v. Pushpa Natwarlal Kansara And ORS.

2015-05-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

P-4-TS-98-11-TP-982-10.DOC Sharayu.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 98 OF 2011 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 982 OF 2010 Dinesh Mulchand Kansara & Ors.

...Plaintiffs

Versus

Pushpa Natwarlal Kansara & Ors.

...Defendants Ms. Nikita Kadam, I/b M/s. M. Ranchhoddas, for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Girin Pandit, for the Defendants No. 1 to 3. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

7th May 2015 PC:- 1.

Not on board. Mentioned. By consent taken on board. 2.

Parties have settled their disputes. They file Consent Terms. These are signed by the parties on both sides. They have been explained to Defendant No. 1 in Gujarati by Defendants No. 2 and

3. All parties are present in Court. The Consent Terms are also signed by the Advocates for parties. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Undertakings in the

P-4-TS-98-11-TP-982-10.DOC Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court. The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms. 3.

The Consent Terms required the transposition by Defendants No. 2 and 3 as co-Plaintiffs. Amendment to be carried out without need of reverification or fresh service on or before 15th May 2015.

4.

Letters of Administration as provided for in clause (8) are to be granted as expeditiously as possible.

(G. S. PATEL, J.)