← Library
Bombay High CourtS/39/2015consent term

M/S. Mehta Developers v. Milind Madhukar Padgaonkar And ORS.

2016-08-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

suit39.15-901

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.39 OF 2015 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1855 OF 2015 WITH SUIT (L) NO.938 OF 2014 M/s.Mehta Developers ....Plaintiffs V/s.

Milind Madhukar Padgaonkar & Ors.

....Defendants ---- Mr.Gautam Ankhad a/w Mr.Viral Shukla and Ms.Priti Pate and Ms.Rupali Lad i/by M/s.Shukla & Associates for plaintiffs. Mr.S.N.Fadia for defendant no.1.

Mr.Bharat L.Jain for defendant nos.32, 33 & 34. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 5.8.2016 P.C.:- The counsel for the plaintiffs and defendant nos. 1 & 32 to 34 state that between themselves the suit has been settled. The counsel for the plaintiffs seeks leave to withdraw the suit as against defendant nos. 2 to 31 & 35. Suit dismissed as against defendant nos. 2 to 31 & 35 as withdrawn.

The consent terms dated 5.8.2016 signed by the plaintiffs and defendant nos. 1, 32 to 34 and their respective advocates is taken on record and marked `X' for identification. Decree in terms of the consent terms. Decree be drawn up accordingly. All undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted and so KJ

suit39.15-901 ordered.

The counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendants state that both the partners of the plaintiffs, defendant no.1 and defendant nos. 32 to 34 are present in court and they identify those persons. Refund of court fees if any, in accordance with Rules. All interim applications stand disposed. All interim orders stand vacated. (K.R.SHRIRAM,J) KJ