Rajesh Dinkar Mhatre v. Kiran Nilkanth Chavan

Shantanu D 903.arbap219-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 219 OF 2021 Rajesh Dinkar Mhatre ...Applicant Vs.

Kiran Nilkant Chavan.

...Respondent

------ Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj for the applicant.

Mr. Umesh Yadav for the respondent.

CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : June 30, 2022.

P.C.:

1.

Learned counsel for the parties have tendered consent terms as arrived between the parties stating that the applicant and respondent have settled their inter se disputes, in terms of what has been agreed in the consent terms.

2.

Consent terms are signed by the applicant and respondent and also signed by the advocates for the applicant and for the respondent. There is no dispute on the signatures as made on the consent terms. The consent terms are accordingly taken on record and marked as X for identification .

3.

The proceedings are disposed in terms of the consent terms. No costs.

[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]