← Library
Bombay High CourtAPP/565/2019dismissed

Dayabhai Sukhabhai Dhimmar v. Urmilaben Manilal Dhimmar

2019-11-21Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre2 pages

(9) Appl 438-19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Amk APPEAL (L) NO. 438 OF 2019 Dayabhai Sukhabhai Dhimmar .. Appellant Vs.

Urmilaben Manilal Dhimmar .. Respondent Mr. R. V. Govilkar a/w. Ms. Shaba Khan i/b Govilkar & Associates for the Appellant.

Mr. Harjit Singh Anand i/b Legal Chartered for the Respondent. CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATE : 21 st NOVEMBER, 2019.

P. C. :

1.

Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, we find no infirmity in the impugned order dated 26.06.2019 which has dismissed the Appellant's petition laying a challenge to an Award dated 08.05.2017. 2.

In view of partnership deed between the Appellant and his late brother, on account of death of the brother, the learned Arbitrator has rightly concluded that the partnership got dissolved and since no fresh deed of partnership was executed, the share of the two brothers would be 50% each in the assets of the partnership. 3.

The contention of the Appellant before the learned Single Judge repeated before us that after his brother died, the Appellant was looking after the family of his brother and some credit should be given to him on said account is a moral argument which overlooks the fact that after 1/2

(9) Appl 438-19 Appellant's brother died, the Appellant took over the entire assets of the partnership firm and generated income therefrom to run the affairs of not only his family but even of his deceased brother. 4.

The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.

[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] by Arjun M.

Kadam Date:

2019.11.21 17:25:52 +0530 Arjun M.

Kadam 2/2