← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMS/773/2017consent term

Mehul Jadavji Shah v. H. M. Holding

2019-04-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram9 pages

1/9

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY AND ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 773 OF 2017 Mehul Jadavji Shah ...Plaintiff Vs.

M/s H.M. Holding and ors.

...Defendants Ms. Hiral Vora I/b Manjar Srivastava Associates for Plaintiff. Mr. Ravi Gandhi I/b. Kanga and Co. for Defendant Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 Mr. Rohan Rajdhyaksha a/w Mr. Rajendra Barot, Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar and Ms. Neeraja Balakrishnan I/b AZB and Partners for Defendant Nos. 5 & 7. Mr. Mehul J. Shah - Plaintiff present in court. Mr. Jaydev Mody - Defendant no. 5 and partner of defendant no. 1, Mr. Harish Mehta - Defendant No. 2, Mr. Anuj Mehta - Defendant No. 3, Mr. Rohan Mehta - Defendant No. 4, Ms. Mayuri H. Mehta - Defendant No. 6 and Mr. Ashish Kapadia - defendant No. 7 are present in court. CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 9th APRIL 2019 P.C.:

Parties have entered into consent terms dated 9th April, 2019. The consent terms signed by plaintiff, partner of defendant no. 1, defendant no. 2 to 7 and their respective advocates is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Mr. Gandhi and Ms. Vora and Mr. Rajdhyaksha states that, the parties whom they are representing are present in the Court and identified them and their signatures. The consent terms is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

Order in terms of consent terms. All statements and undertakings accepted and so ordered.

2/9 For ease of reference, a scanned copy of the consent terms is reproduced hereinbelow:

3/9

4/9

5/9

6/9

7/9

8/9 Suit accordingly stand disposed of. No order as to costs. Refund, if any, of court fees in accordance with rules.

9/9 All interim orders stand vacated and all interim applications stand disposed of.

All to act on authenticated copy of this order. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)