Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Vinodkumar Agarwal And 4 ORS.

RMA 11.wp2644.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2644 OF 2014 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited : Petitioner V/s.

Vinodkumar Agarwal & Ors.

: Respondents ...

Mr.Rohit Gupta with Mr.Nikhil Rajani i/b. V.Deshpande & Co., for the petitioner.

Mr.D.D. Gaddam i/b. Mr.R.P.Lote for respondent no.1. ...

CORAM : D.H. WAGHELA, C.J. & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2016.

P.C.:

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will prefer an application before the D.R.T. and those proceedings are required to be expedited.

2.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the D.R.T.

RMA 11.wp2644.14.doc 3.

As for expeditious hearing of the matter before the D.R.T., the petitioner needs to file appropriate application before the D.R.T.

(CHIEF JUSTICE) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)