Anil Kapoor v. Orbit Corporation Limited

1/2 22.SS-891-2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.891 OF 2015 Anil Kapoor ....Plaintiff V/s.

Orbit Corporation Limited ....Defendant ---- None for the plaintiff.

Ms. Veenu Chunilal Khatri for the defendant.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 19 th JULY, 2016 P.C.:- The counsel for the defendant states that the defendant have not deposited the amount as directed in the order dated 13th June, 2016. The counsel for the defendant further states that the defendant have preferred an appeal against the order dated 13th June, 2016 but when they moved an application for stay, the court directed them to deposit some amount, which the defendant expressed cannot be done and therefore, the stay was rejected. Hence there is no impediment for going ahead with the matter.

The defendant having failed to comply with the preconditions for leave to defend as directed in the order dated 13th June, 2016, the plaintiff will be entitled to a decree. Gauri Gaekwad

2/2 22.SS-891-2015.doc The suit stands decreed. The plaintiff is also entitled to cost in the sum of Rs.1 lakh.

Decree be drawn up accordingly.

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J) Gauri Gaekwad