← Library
Bombay High CourtS/1012/2015consent term

Pidilite Industries Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited

2015-10-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

906-SL889-15.DOC Atul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 889 OF 2015 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2381 OF 2015 PIDILITE Industries Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

Berger Paints India Limited ...Defendant Mr. N. Nadkarni, with Mr. S. Rane, i/b M/s. Legasis Partners, for the Plaintiff.

Mr. R. Ajatshatru, i/b Anand & Anand, for the Defendant.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

29th October 2015 PC:- 1.

The Suit is settled. Consent terms are tendered. These are signed by Mr. Samir Pradhan, Head (Legal) of the Plaintiff, and by Mr. M.A. Mateen, Senior Vice President of the Defendant, as also by the parties' respective Advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

906-SL889-15.DOC 2.

The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the consent terms.

3.

In view of this, the Notice of Motion does not survive and is disposed of as infructuous.

4.

Drawn up decree is dispensed with.

5.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (G. S. PATEL, J.)