Unitech Construction v. Maharashtra Maritime Board And ANR

23-wpl-2793-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2793 OF 2017 Unitech Construction

...Petitioner

vs.

Maharashtra Maritime Board and Another

...Respondents

Mr. Rajesh Patil a/w. Mr. Meet Sawant i/b. Mr. M.M. Kadam, for the Petitioner.

Mr. U.S. Upadhyay, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rupesh Geete i/b. Legasis Partners, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Fazal Jahangir, Partner of the Petitioner Firm present. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & R.G. KETKAR, JJ.

DATE :

DECEMBER 18, 2017 P.C.:

.

In terms of the order passed on 11th December, 2017 the Respondents have considered the Petitioner's prayer for grant of opportunity to the Petitioner to complete the balance work within six weeks. The letter dated 18th December, 2017 issued by the Respondent No. 1 to the Petitioner is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

2.

The learned counsel for the Petitioner in the presence of the partner of the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner will now complete the balance work within a period of six weeks from today. Vishal Parekar 1/2

23-wpl-2793-2017.doc He also submits that the undertaking to that effect will be submitted before this Court on or before 22nd December, 2017. 3.

In the circumstances, in our considered view the Petition has been worked out and is disposed of as such. 4.

As it is not in dispute that the procedure to be followed for the blacklisting was not followed by the Respondents before passing the order impugned, the notice of blacklisting stands quashed.

(R.G.KETKAR, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2