Brand David Communications Pvt. Ltd. And ANR v. Vivo Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. And ANR

Chittewan 1/2

1. comipl 1065-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO.1065 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2019 Brand David Communications Pvt.

Ltd And Another ...

Plaintiffs/Applicants

Versus

Vivo Mobile India Pvt. Ltd.

Another ...

Defendants .....

Mr. Nimish G. Pandya i/b Pandya & Co. for the Plaintiffs/Applicants. Mr. Kunal Kanungo for Defendant No.1.

Mr. Rushabh Sheth i/b M.S. Bodhanwalla & Co. for Defendant No.2. .....

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATE : 25 NOVEMBER 2019 P. C. :

.

Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs seeks leave to withdraw the commercial IP suit as settled out of court. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Refund of court fees in accordance with the applicable rules.

The Prothonotary and Senior Master of this court to return the bank guarantee furnished by Defendant No.1.

In view of the dismissal of the Suit, the Interim Application does not survive and is disposed of.

Chittewan 2/2

1. comipl 1065-19.doc All parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (S.C. GUPTE, J.) by Rajesh V.

Chittewan Date: 2020.01.08 11:31:58 +0530 Rajesh V.

Chittewan