Shraddha Sonawane v. The Inquiry Committee Chembur Karnataka High School And 2 ORS.

* 1/2 * 33-WPL-2844-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2844 OF 2017 Shraddha Sonawane Wife of Santosh Sonawane ....Petitioner V/s.

The Inquiry Committee & Ors.

....Respondents None for Petitioner.

Mr. D.S.Mhaispurkar with Mr. Mustafa Banatwala, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Mr. G.W.Mattos, AGP for Respondent No.3.

****** CORAM :- CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI & B.R.GAVAI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 7TH NOVEMBER, 2017.

7TH NOVEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :- P.C. :- None for the Petitioner.

Even otherwise, the Petition challenges constitution of the Enquiry Committee and the proceedings in the Enquiry Committee.

If Enquiry Committee is not properly constituted or proceedings of the Enquiry Committee is not conducted as per law, an employee, if an order is passed against her interest, can always challenge the same in the appropriate proceedings provided under the MEPS Act.

Shivgan

* 2/2 * 33-WPL-2844-2017.doc In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. The Petition is, therefore, rejected relegating the Petitioner to the remedy available in law.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (B.R.GAVAI, J) (B.R.GAVAI, J) Shivgan