Jayesh Kala And ANR v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 46 OF 2015 Jayesh Kala and Others.

..Petitioners.

Versus

M.C.G.M. & Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2231 OF 2015 Atul Tanna and Another ..Petitioners.

Versus

M.C.G.M. & Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2234 OF 2015 Nikhilesh Kakkad.

..Petitioners.

Versus

M.C.G.M. & Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2283 OF 2015 Atul Khimani and Anr.

..Petitioners.

Versus

M.C.G.M. & Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2294 OF 2015 Abhay Shanbaugh and Anr.

..Petitioners.

Versus

M.C.G.M. & Others.

..Respondents.

Mr. D. H. Mehta i/b D. M. Legal Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. J. Reis, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. C. Pimple for the Respondent - MCGM.

Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

Date : June 22, 2016.

patilsr 1 / 2

P. C. :

1.

Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file representations with Respondent No.3 for regularisation of the offending structures. Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted. Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and are dismissed as such. 2.

In the event, the Petitioners make such representations for regularisation within two weeks from today, Respondent No.3 shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within the period of four weeks of filing thereof.

3.

It is expressly made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the matter and all points and contentions of the respective parties are kept open to be agitated before Respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 shall decide the said representations for regularisation in accordance with law. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 2 / 2