The Commissioner Of Service Tax, Mumbai Vi v. M/S. Evonic Energy Services

9-CEXA-81-2017.DOC jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2017 The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, VI ... Appellant

Versus

M/s. Evonic Energy Services

...Respondent

Shri Swapnil Bangur, and Smt. Shalaka A. Gujar - Karande for the Appellant.

Mr. Prabhakar Shetty, for the Respondent.

CORAM:

M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED:

21ST AUGUST, 2018 PC:- 1.

This Appeal under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 (Act) read with Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 challenges the order dated 21st March 2016 passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.

2.

The instructions / circular dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs directs the Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Revenue not to file fresh appeals and also withdraw the pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. by Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Date: 2018.08.28 16:29:31 +0530 3.

In the above view, Mr. Bangur, the learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal, on written instructions dated 1/2

9-CEXA-81-2017.DOC 6th August, 2018 of Mr. Sandeep Puri, Commissioner, CGST, Mumbai West seeks to withdraw the appeal.

4.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5.

Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.

( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) 2/2