The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii, Pune, v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

901 to 907-NMA.1602.2015+.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1602 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 23 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1603 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 20 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1608 OF 2012 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1604 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 24 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1605 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 19 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1536 OF 2012 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1606 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 17 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1537 OF 2012 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1607 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 18 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2012 J.V.Salunke,PA

901 to 907-NMA.1602.2015+.doc WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1608 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 21 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1650 OF 2012 The Principal Commissioner } of Income Tax - III, Pune } Applicant versus Loknete Balasaheb Desai } Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana } Ltd.

} Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the applicant.

Mr. Rohan Deshpande i/b. Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & A. A. SAYED, JJ.

DATED :- OCTOBER 19, 2016 P.C. :- (In Chamber) 1.

We have heard Mr. Tejveer Singh appearing in support of these notices of motion for condonation of delay and Mr.Deshpande appearing for the respondent.

2.

For the reasons set out in the affidavits in support and which constitute sufficient cause, we condone the delay in filing each of these review petitions. The Notices of motion are accordingly disposed of.

(A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA