Unilever Plc. And ANR v. Joy Pagla Baba, Ratna Ice Cream

908-SL979-16.DOC ATUL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 979 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 3017 OF 2016 Unilever PLC & Another ...Plaintiffs

Versus

Joy Pagla Baba, Ratna Ice Cream ...Defendant Mr. Ashutosh Kane, with Mr. Nikhil Sharma, & Ms. Anusha Ramanathan, i/b M/s. W.S. Kane & Co., for the Plaintiffs. Ms. Karishma Shirke, i/b Mr. Mehul R.

Thakkar, for the Defendants.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

30th November 2016 PC:- 1.

Ms. Shirke has written instructions from the Defendants to submit to a decree. These instructions are in a letter dated 23rd November 2016. A copy of this is already on file. I am shown the original, which is now returned to Ms. Shirke. 2.

The Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Mr. Kane, therefore, does not press the prayer for damages.

30th November 2016

908-SL979-16.DOC 3.

Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

4.

The packaging is to be destroyed after removing the goods. The Defendants will do this destruction at their own cost within 12 weeks and file an affidavit of compliance within 16 weeks. The goods may be reused.

5.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

6.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 3017 of 2016 does not survive and is disposed accordingly.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 30th November 2016