Shabnam Rajendra Ballal v. State Of Maharashtra And 2 ORS.

sng nmw-449.16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.449 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.579 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders.

Registrar's orders.

Shri A.Hussain i/b Shivraj Kunchage for the Applicant. Ms. Kavita Salunke, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Geeta Jogalekar for the Respondent No.3 BMC. - CORAM :

A.S. OKA & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ DATED :

18TH NOVEMBER 2016 P.C.:

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, the learned AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.3.

3.

In view of the averments made in the affidavit

sng nmw-449.16 in support, a case for restoration is made out of the Writ Petition which was rejected in exercise of the powers under Rule 986 of the High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A) subject to condition of removing all the office objections within a period of three weeks from today. If all office objections are not removed within the stipulated period, the order of dismissal will stand. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)