Rushikesh Nakwadi v. Registrar General And ANR

911(ii)-WPL.2858.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2858 OF 2016 Rushikesh Nakwadi } Petitioner versus Registrar General, High } Court and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. Yuvraj P. Narvankar for the petitioner-absent.

Mr. Rahul Nerlekar for respondent no. 1.

Ms. Jyoti Chavan-AGP for respondent no.2.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATED :- NOVEMBER 15, 2017 P.C. :- 1.

This petition is filed by advocate Narvankar on behalf of the petitioner-Rushikesh Nakwadi. Though it has been listed for admission along with other petitions, we find that the Registry, in exercise of powers conferred by Rule 986 of the High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980, has dismissed this petition on 14th March, 2017. No attempt has been made to restore this petition to the file. A notice of motion was moved for the purpose of seeking quashing and setting aside of the conditional order passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master. That motion was allowed and a further conditional order was passed by a Division Bench of this court on 4th September, 2017. We are not assisted J.V.Salunke,PA

911(ii)-WPL.2858.2016.doc in any manner by pointing out whether the office objections are removed and the petition has been registered in accordance with the rules or otherwise. Despite giving several opportunities to Mr. Narvankar and the petitioner to remain present and argue the petition, they have remained absent. This petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA