← Library
Bombay High CourtARBP/1637/2014disposed off

L And T Finance Ltd. v. M/S Aem Ventures A Pertnership Firm And 2 Others

2015-01-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla6 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1637 OF 2014 L & T Finance Limited ...

Petitioner V/s.

AEM Ventures & Anr.

...

Respondents Mr. Girish Thakur For the Petitioner None for the Respondents CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.

DATED : 27 TH JANUARY,2015 P.C.:

1.

The above Petition is filed by the Petitioner under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking reliefs as prayed against the Respondents. The Petition is served on the Respondents and an affidavit proving service is on record. The petition is today taken up for final hearing. However, none appear for the Respondents. 2.

By a Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement dated 30.09.2013, the Petitioner provided a loan of Rs. 1,58,00,000/- to the First Respondent for Purchase of vehicles/equipments (i) VOLVO EC240 BLC (2010) bearing Serial No. 15262 & Engine No.10908393; (ii) VOLVO EC240 BLC (2010) bearing Serial No. 15330 & Engine No. 10941825 ; (iii) VOLVO EC240 BLC (2010) bearing Serial No. 15261 & Engine No. 10916177; (iv)

VOLVO EC240 BLC (2010) bearing Serial No. 15218 & Engine No.10900373 ; ("Said Equipments") more particularly described in Exhibit "F" to the Petition and on the terms described in the Loan-CumHypothecation Agreement dated 30.09.2013. Under the said Agreement, the said Equipments were hypothecated with the Petitioner by the Respondent No.1, as security for repayment of the Loan amount. 3.

The loan amount of Rs. 1,58,00,000/-(Rupees One Crore Fifty Eight Lac Only) was repayable by the Respondents to the Petitioner with interest @ 9.00% p.a. for Schedules aggregating to Rs. 1,86,43,800/- (Rupees One Crore Eighty Six Lac Forty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Only) as mentioned herein below :

For Schedule I - EFD016060R1300707111 - An amount of Rs. 46,60,950/- in 23 monthly instalments of Rs. 2,02,650/- X 23 commencing from 10th December, 2013 and ending on 10th October, 2015.

For Schedule II - EFD016060R1300707112 - An amount of Rs. 46,60,950/- in 23 monthly instalments of Rs. 2,02,650/- X 23 commencing from 10th December, 2013 and ending on 10th October, 2015.

For Schedule III - EFD016060R1300707113 - An amount of Rs. 46,60,950/- in 23 monthly instalments of Rs. 2,02,650/- X 23 commencing from 10th December, 2013 and ending on 10th October, 2015.

For Schedule IV - EFD016060R1300707114 - An amount of Rs. 46,60,950/- in 23 monthly instalments of Rs. 2,02,650/- X 23 commencing from 10th December, 2013 and ending on 10th October, 2015.

4.

Respondent No. 2 has guaranteed the due repayment of the loan. Clause 12 of the Loan-Cum-Hypothecation Agreement provides for the events of default; Clause 13 for the consequences of default; Clause 14 provides for the right of the Petitioner on default including repossession of the assets. Clause 17 provides for arbitration. There has been a default on the part of the Respondents and the Respondents failed to pay to the Petitioner a sum of Rs. 2,02,73,120/- (Rupees Two Crore Two Lac Seventy Three Thousand One Hundred and Twenty Only) as on 12.11.2014. The Petitioner therefore became entitled to recall and have recalled the entire loan. There was no reply to the Loan Recall Notice dated 17.11.2014. The Petitioner therefore invoked the arbitration Clause in the Loan-CumHypothecation Agreement dated 30.09.2013.

5.

In the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought appointment of the Court Receiver, High Court Bombay as the Receiver of the hypothecated Equipments, more particularly described in Exhibit "F" to the petition. The Respondents have not filed their Affidavit in Reply and are also not present before the court. In absence of any defense or contest by the Respondents, the averments contained in the Petition have remained uncontroverted. I see no reason why the statements/submissions made by the Petitioner in the Petition should not be accepted. As the Respondents have defaulted in the repayment of the outstanding dues, it is just and necessary to safeguard the interest of the Petitioner by appointing the Court Receiver as Receiver of the hypothecated Equipments.

The appointment of the receiver is necessary in order to ensure that the hypothecated Equipments are not wasted or alienated, thereby defeating the rights of the Petitioner. Further interim injunction in terms of the prayer clause (e) also needs to be granted to protect the rights of the Petitioner. The claim of the Petitioner is over Rs. 2, 02, 73,120/- and unless adequately protected, the Petitioner may suffer irreparable harm and injury. Balance of convenience also warrants the grant of relief. Section 9 empowers the court to pass interim measures of protection.

(i) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the arbitration proceedings, the Court Receiver is appointed as Receiver in respect of the Hypothecated Equipments, more particularly described in Exhibit "F" to the Petition, with direction to take forcible physical possession of the said Equipments with police assistance, if required, and without any prior notice to the Respondents;

(ii) The Court Receiver shall within a period of two weeks after taking possession, give an option to the Respondents, in writing to act as an agent of the Receiver in respect of the said Equipments. The Respondents shall be given two weeks time by the Court Receiver from the date of receipt of the Court Receiver's communication/letter to exercise such an option. In the events of the Respondent/s being desirous of acting as agents of the Court Receiver, they shall be appointed as agents of the Receiver, subject to deposit of security and payment of royalty. The Receiver shall determine the quantum of security and royalty having regard to the terms and conditions contained in the Loan Cum Hypothecation Agreement (Exhibit "A" to the Petition); (iii) In the event that the Respondents do not communicate their willingness to the Receiver to act as agent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the communication from the Court Receiver, it

would be open to the Petitioners to apply to the court for further orders including sale of the Equipments by private treaty; (iv) There shall also be an interim injunction restraining the Respondents from disposing of alienating, encumbering, parting with possession or creating any third party rights in respect of the said Equipments described in Exhibit "F" to the Petition. 1.

The Arbitration Petition is accordingly disposed of. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )