The Commissioner Of Customs C.S.I. Airport, Mumbai v. Ivan Lesli Anthony Pinto

chs274.doc ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.274 OF 2019 IN CUSTOM APPEAL NO.27 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Swapnil Bangur for the Applicant CORAM : A.S.OKA, & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ DATE : APRIL 11, 2019 P.C.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

The address of the respondent-assessee mentioned in the cause title of the appeal is the same as the address mentioned by the respondent-assessee in the appeal preferred by him before the Appellate Tribunal. In view of the assertions made in the affidavit in support and in particular paragraphs 3 to 5, it appears to us that notice could not be served in ordinary way at the address mentioned by the respondent before the Appellate Tribunal. Hence, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of

chs274.doc prayer clause (a).

We make it clear that the cost of the public notice published in terms of prayer clause (a) shall be borne and paid by the applicant. Registry to fix appropriate returnable date for notice.

(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)