Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Parimal Ramnikbhai Lakhitia

913-SL997-16.DOC ATUL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 997 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 3092 OF 2016 AND LEAVE PETITION NO. 323 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ...Plaintiffs

Versus

Parimal Ramnikbhai Lakhtaria ...Defendant Mr. Ashutosh Kane, a/w Ms.

Anusha Ramanathan, i/b W. S. Kane & Co., for the Plaintiffs.

Mr. Parimalbhai Ramnikbhai Lakhtaria, Defendant, in person. Mr. M. R. Mandawgade, OSD from the Office of the Court Receiver, present.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

9th December 2016 PC:- 1.

By consent, the Leave Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

2.

Mr. Lakhtaria, the Defendant, who is personally present in Court, submits to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and 9th December 2016

913-SL997-16.DOC (e) of the Suit. In view thereof, Mr. Kane does not presses his prayer for damages.

3.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

4.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendant at their cost within a period of 12 weeks. The Defendant will file an Affidavit of compliance within a period of four weeks thereafter.

5.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

6.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 3092 of 2016 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 9th December 2016