The Commissioner Of Service Tax Iv Mumbai Commissionerate v. M/S Bank Of Baroda

19-NMA.2724.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2724 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 197 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Service } Tax-IV } Applicant versus M/s. Bank of Baroda } Respondent Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B.

Mishra for the applicant/appellant.

None for the respondent.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATED :- MARCH 20, 2017 P.C. :-

1. The respondent is duly served. It is absent. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 69 days in filing the appeal. The reasons assigned in the affidavit in support constitute sufficient cause for the respondent not being able to abide by the time limit. Hence, the delay is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would be no order as to costs. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA