Sonali Nimish Arora v. Sandeep Gopal Raheja And 33 ORS

901-nms1845-17 vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1845 OF 2017 IN SUIT NO.2363 OF 2012 Sandeep G. Raheja ...Applicant / ...Deft.No.1

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Sonali N. Arora ...Plaintiff V/s.

Sandeep G. Rajeha & Ors.

...Defendants Mr.Chirag Mody with Mr.Aziz Khan, Ms.Rutika Motwani, Ms.Archana K., Mr.Kiran Shah and Ms.Shraddha Ambre i/b Divya Shah Associates for the Plaintiff.

Mr.Karl Tamboly with Mr.Jehangir Jejeebhoy, Mr.Vivek Vashi, Ms.Alya Khan and Ms.Aditi Bhansali i/b Mr.Vivek Vashi for the Defendant Nos.1 to 4.

Mr.Oendrai Neogi with Ms.Ashwini Vaidalingam i/b AZB Partners for the Defendant Nos.7 to 19, 22, 24, 25, 31 and 32. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

P.C. :- 1.

The parties agree that the evidence in Suit No.103 of 2015 on the preliminary issues framed under section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 shall be treated as and deemed to be evidence on the preliminary issues framed under section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in Suit No.2363 of 2012. It is also clarified that 1/2

901-nms1845-17 the evidence of the defendant no.1 and his cross-examination in Suit No.103 of 2015 shall also be treated as and deemed to be evidence in Suit No.2363 of 2012.

2.

The notice of motion is disposed of in aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.) 2/2