← Library
Bombay High CourtCSP/831/2015scheme sanctioned company

Dynamix-Man Prefab Ltd. v. -

2016-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram9 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 831 OF 2015.

CONNECTED WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 757 OF 2015. DYNAMIX-MAN PREFAB LIMITED ....Petitioner/ the Transferor Company AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 832 OF 2015.

CONNECTED WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 758 OF 2015. CONWOOD PRE-FAB LIMITED ....Petitioner/ the Transferee Company In the matter of the Companies Act, of and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013;

AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 and

other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013;

AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of DYNAMIX-MAN PREFAB LIMITED, the Transferor Company with CONWOOD PRE-FAB LIMITED, the Transferee Company Called for hearing Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D.P. Singh i/b Mr. A.A. Ansari for the Regional Director. Mr. Vinod Sharma, the Official Liquidator, present. CORAM: K. R. Shriram, J.

DATE: 26th February, 2016 PC:

1.

Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. No objector has come before the court to oppose the Scheme nor any party has controverted any averments made in the Petitions.

2.

The sanction of the Court is sought to a Scheme of Amalgamation of DYNAMIX-MAN PREFAB LIMITED, the Transferor Company with CONWOOD PRE- FAB LIMITED, the Transferee Company under Sections 391 to 394 and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

3.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Transferor Company has been carrying on the business of manufacturing, processing, refining, preparing, prefabricating, importing, exporting, purchasing, selling, acting as Commission Agent and the Transferee Company has been carrying on the business of manufacturing, refining, preparing, processing, selling and generally dealing in coloured, white, fire, Portland cement and Aluminia cement and cement products.

thus consolidation of business of the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company in one entity which will result in savings of cost and improvement in the revenues and margins of the Amalgamated Company, all the shareholders of the merged entity will be benefited by result of the amalgamation of Business and availability of a common operating platform and that Amalgamation of the Transferor Company with the Transferee Company will also provide an opportunity to leverage combined assets and build a stronger sustainable business.

Specifically, the merger will enable optimal utilization of existing resources and provide an opportunity to fully leverage strong assets, capabilities, experience, expertise and infrastructure of both the companies and that the Scheme of amalgamation will result in cost saving for both the companies as they are capitalizing on each others core competency and resources which are expected to result in stability of operations, cost savings and higher profitability levels for the Amalgamated Company, thus it will immensely benefit the shareholders of both the companies.

4.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners further states that the Board of Directors of the Petitioner Companies have approved the said Scheme of Amalgamation by passing Board Resolutions which are annexed to the respective Company Scheme Petitions.

5.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners further states that Petitioner Companies have complied with all the directions passed in the respective Company Summons for Directions and that the respective Company Scheme Petitions have been filed in consonance with the orders passed in respective Company Summons for Directions. 6.

The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners have stated that the Petitioner Companies have complied with all requirements as per directions of this Court and they have filed necessary affidavit of compliance in the Court. Moreover, the Petitioner Companies undertake to comply with all statutory requirements if any, as required under the Companies Act, 1956 / 2013 and rules made there under whichever is applicable. The said undertaking is accepted. 7.

The Official Liquidator has filed his report on 2nd day of February, 2016 in Company Scheme Petition No. 831 of 2015 stating that the affairs of the Transferor Company has been conducted in a proper manner and that the Transferor Company may be ordered to be dissolved. 8.

The Regional Director has filed an Affidavit on 14th day of January, 2016 stating therein, save and except as stated in paragraph 6, it appears that the Scheme is not prejudicial to the interest of shareholders and public. In paragraph 6 of the said Affidavit, the Regional Director has stated that:- "6. That the Deponent further submits that

(a) Clause 13.4 of the scheme provides for adjustment for differences in Accounting Policies between Transferor Company and Transferee Company. In this regard, it is submitted that in addition to the compliance of Accounting Standard-14, the Transferee Company shall pass such accounting entries which are necessary in connection with the scheme to comply with other applicable Accounting Standard such as AS-5 etc.

(b) That the Deponent further submits that the Tax issue if any arising out of this scheme shall be subject to final decision of Income Tax Authority and approval of the scheme by Hon'ble High court may not deter the Income Tax Authority to scrutinize the tax returns filed by the petitioner company after giving effect to the amalgamation. The decision of the Income Tax Authority is binding on the petitioner company.

9.

So far as the observation in paragraph 6 (a) of the Affidavit of Regional Director is concerned, the Petitioner Company through its counsel submitted that in addition to the compliance of Accounting Standard - 14, the Transferee Company shall pass such accounting entries which are necessary in connection with the Scheme to comply with other applicable Accounting Standard such as AS-5 etc

10. So far as the observation in paragraph 6 (b) of the Affidavit of Regional Director is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Companies submit that the Petitioner Companies are bound to comply with all applicable provisions of Income Tax Act and all tax issues arising out of the Scheme will be met and answered in accordance with law.

11. The Learned Counsel for Regional Director on instructions of Mr. M. Chandana Muthu, Joint Director Legal in the office of the Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Western Region, Mumbai states that they are satisfied with the undertakings given by the Petitioners. The above undertakings are accepted.

12. From the material on record, the Scheme appears to be fair and reasonable and is not violative of any provisions of law and is not contrary to public policy.

13. Since all the requisite statutory compliances have been fulfilled, Company Scheme Petition No. 831 of 2015 is made absolute in terms of prayers clause (a) to (d) and 832 of 2015 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c).

14. The Petitioner Companies to file a copy of this order and the Scheme duly authenticated by the Company Registrar, High Court (O.S.), Bombay, with the concerned Superintendent of Stamps, for the purpose

of adjudication of stamp duty payable, if any, on the same within 60 days from the date of the Order.

15. The Petitioners are directed to file a certified copy of order along with a copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation with the concerned Registrar of Companies, electronically, along with E Form INC- 28 in addition to physical copy as per the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956/2013 whichever is applicable.

16. The Petitioner Companies to pay costs of Rs.10,000/- each to the Regional Director, Western Region, Mumbai and the Petitioner in the Company Scheme Petition No. 831 of 2015 to pay costs of Rs.10,000/- to the Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay. Cost to be paid within four weeks from the date of the Order.

17. Filing and issuance of the drawn up order is dispensed with.

18. All concerned regulatory authorities to act on a copy of this order along with Scheme duly authenticated by the Company Registrar, High Court (O. S.), Bombay.

(K. R. Shriram, J.)

CERTIFICATE I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

Uploaded by : Shankar Gawde, Stenographer.