The Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Radha Madhav Investments Ltd.

Uday S. Jagtap 680-18-ITXA-C-4to99=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 680 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant v/s.

Vijay Arjundas Luthra .. Respondent ALONG WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 749/2017, 776/2017, 834/2017, 846/2018, 681/2018, 712/2018, 713/2018, 723/2018, 731/2018, 732/2018, 783/2018, 791/2018, 816/2018, 875/2018, 884/2018, 890/2018, 891/2018, 901/2018, 908/2018, 928/2018, 828/2018 AND 788/18 Mr. Sham V. Walve for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 680/18, 681/18, 723/18, 731/18, 732/18, 783/18, 791/18, 816/18, 875/18, 884/18, 890/18, 891/18, 901/18, 908/18 and 928/18 Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 712/18, 713/18, 749/17, 776/17, 834/17 and 846/17 Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the appellant in ITXA No. 828/18 Mr. N.N. Singh for the appellant in ITXA No. 788/18 Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent in ITXA Nos. 712/18, 713/18, 723/18, 884/18, and 890/18 Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar for the respondent in ITXA Nos.783/18, 791/18 and 788/18 Mr. Jay Bhansali for the respondent in ITXA No.828/18 CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J.

DATED : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2019

Uday S. Jagtap 680-18-ITXA-C-4to99=.doc P.C.

1.

Learned learned Counsel appearing in support of these appeals, on instructions, seeks to withdraw these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than the threshold limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 and revised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019. 2.

In the above view, these appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules.

(NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)