Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-30 v. Jignesh Madhukant Mehta

Uday S. Jagtap 950-2007-ITXA-501-520=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 950 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-23 .. Appellant v/s.

M/s. Shree Sidhi Builders & Developers .. Respondent ALONG WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 1163/2008, 3129/2009, 3694/2010, 1502/2012, 335/2013, 576/2013, 2090/2013, 2404/2013, 105/2015, 318/2018, 389/2018, 1049/2018, 2339/2018, 2561/2018, 2933/2018, 900/2019 AND INCOME TAX (L) NO.567/2019 Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 950/07, 1163/08, 3129/09, 3694/10, 1502/12, 335/2013, 576/13, 2090/13, 2404/13, 105/15, 318/18, 389/18, 2339/18, 2933/18 and 900/19 Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in ITXA No. 1049/18 Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the appellant in ITXA No. 567/19 Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent/s in ITXA Nos. 3129/09, 3694/10, 335/13, 2090/13 and 105/15 Mr. V.S. Hadade for the respondent/s in ITXA Nos. 2404/13, 318/18 and 2339/18 Mr. Atul Jasani for the responden/s in ITXA No.1049/18 Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondent in ITXA 576/13 CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J.

DATED : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2019 P.C.

Uday S. Jagtap 950-2007-ITXA-501-520=.doc 1.

The learned Counsel appearing in support of the above appeals, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than the threshold limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 and revised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019. 2.

In the above view, these appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules.

(NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)