The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central- I Mumbai v. M/S. Medispray Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

7. os itxa 986-09.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

O.O.C.J.

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 986 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax Central I ..

Appellant

Versus

M/s. Medispray Laboratories P Ltd ..

Respondent ...................

 Mr. Sham Walve a/w Pritesh Chatterjee for the Appellant  Mr. Netaji Gawade i/by Sanjay Udeshi & Co for the Respondent ...................

CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 23, 2020.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel, revenue for the appellant. He submits that he has not received any instructions from the department. 2.

In this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed by the revenue, the tax effect is less than the prescribed limit of Rs. one crore in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019, being Rs. 24,95,967/- 3.

In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

Refund of Court fees as per rules.

Digitally signed by Ravindra M.

Amberkar Date:

2020.01.24 11:04:32 +0530 [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Ravindra M.

Amberkar