Rajkumar Sadh v. H And M (Hennes And Mauritz Ab) And ANR.

1/2 69.CHOL1110.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER ORDER NO.1110 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO.765 OF 2018 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1439 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO.765 OF 2018 Rajkumar Sadh )....Plaintiff V/s.

H & M (Hennes & Mauritz AB) & Anr.

)....Defendants ---- Mr.Rajkumar Sadh-Plaintiff appeared in person. None for defendants.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 1.2.2019 P.C.:- 1.

Registry has, after interviewing plaintiff as required under chapter IV-A(ii) of Bombay High Court (A.S.) Rules, opined that plaintiff will not be in a position to assist the court effectively in disposal of this matter.

2.

The chamber order is for leave to amend the plaint. Without any assistance from plaintiff, considering the nature of the KJ

2/2 69.CHOL1110.18.doc application and that it is a pre trial amendment and as observed by the Additional Registrar and Prothonotary & Senior Master that even writ of summons has not been served, I decided to pass the following order considering the record & proceedings.

ORDER

(1) Chamber order listed today is for leave to amend the plaint. Since even writ of summons has not been served, I am allowing Chamber Order. Defendants may raise all their contentions in their written statement.

(2) Chamber order accordingly disposed. Amendments to be carried out within 3 weeks from today. The plaint with the writ of summons to be served on defendants within 8 weeks from today. (3) In view of the above, Chamber summons stands disposed. (K.R.SHRIRAM,J) KJ