Dhyaana Rajiv Samani v. Satvik Rajiv Samani And 8 ORS.

Before : Shri A. M. Chandekar Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 13th March, 2018 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL (ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS) : CHOL/1371/2017 CHOLL/616/2017 S/969/2014 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Mr. Shishir Manjrekar, Advocate for Applicants/Defendant Nos. 4 and 7.

P.C. :

The present Chamber Order is taken out for restoration of Chamber Order, dismissed by Order dated 02.08.2017 under the provision of O.S.Rule 986.

Perused Affidavit in Support. Heard Ld.

Counsel for Applicants. According to the Applicants, office objections could not be removed in time due to inadvertence and work pressure. It is further contended that clerk of Advocate for Applicant did not inform about office objections.

Ld. Counsel for Applicants placed on record Affidavit of Service, which is taken on record. Despite service, none appeared on behalf of Respondents/ Plaintiffs.

As none appeared to resist Chamber Order, contention raised by the Applicants needs to be accepted.

Accordingly, Chamber Order is granted as prayed and signed separately.

Applicant and/or his Advocate to remove office objections on the Chamber Order and get the same numbered and regd. on or before 27-032018, failing Chamber Order to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986.

Date : 13.03.2018 Prothonotary & Senior Master