Wendy Sangtani v. Citrus Hair And Beauty Salon

909-NMSL2775-15.DOC Atul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2775 OF 2015 IN SUIT (L) NO. 992 OF 2015 Wendy Sangtani ...Plaintiff

Versus

Citrus Hair & Beauty Salon ...Defendant Mr. C. Mody, with Mr. R. Jogani, i/b DSK Legal, for the Plaintiff. Mr. F. Khan, with S.R. Nachan, for the Defendant. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

26th October 2015 PC:- 1.

Learned Advocate for the Defendants have written instructions to make a statement that the Defendant has ceased use of the impugned mark "CITRUS" in respect of the business of a hair dressing and beauty salon. The statement is accepted as an undertaking to the Court.

2.

I note that the Defendants are in the process of re-branding their outlet. They must ensure that during this exercise they do not even by accident mention that their outlet was formerly known as

909-NMSL2775-15.DOC "CITRUS" and is now acquiring a new name. Mr. Khan accepts this and makes a statement to this effect too. This is also accepted as an undertaking to the Court.

3.

These statements having been accepted, nothing survives in either the Notice of Motion or the Suit.

4.

The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms. (G. S. PATEL, J.)