The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21,Mum v. M/S Ray Construction

Priya Soparkar 3 itxa 2330-09-os IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2330 OF 2009 PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai.

... Appellant V/s.

M/s Ray Construction ... Respondent PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2022.08.22 14:20:25 +0530 --- Mr.P.A.Narayanan, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr.Ashok J. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent. --- CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 22, 2022.

P.C.:- 1.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8th August, 2019. It is stated that no instructions have been received from the Department to withdraw the present appeal. 2.

In the light of Circular No.17 of 2019, the appeal is disposed of as involving low tax effect.

3.

However, we observe that in case, the Revenue finds for some reason that the appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn in the light of the Circular, it would be open to the Revenue to file an application/praecipe seeking restoration of the appeal to be decided on its own merits. 4.

Refund of Court-fees as per rules.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)