Seema Pradeep Dhamdhere v. Citizens For A Just Society And 7 ORS.

Rane * 1/2 * RPW-27-2007 (SR.32) Monday, 29.1.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 27 OF 2007 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 7 OF 2006 Seema Pradeep Dhamdhere ....Petitioner V/s.

Citizens for a Just Society and 7 Ors.

....Respondents * * * * * Mr. S.R. Ganbavale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for respondent no.2.

CORAM :- CORAM :- R.M. SAVANT, & R.M. SAVANT, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 29TH JANUARY, 2018.

29TH JANUARY, 2018.

P.C. :- P.C. :- 1.

1.

The Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states The Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner having superannuated during the that the petitioner having superannuated during the pendency of the above Review Petition, nothing survives pendency of the above Review Petition, nothing survives for consideration in the above Review Petition. In view of for consideration in the above Review Petition. In view of

Rane * 2/2 * RPW-27-2007 (SR.32) Monday, 29.1.2018 the said statement made by the Learned Counsel, the the said statement made by the Learned Counsel, the Review Petition is disposed of as having turned Review Petition is disposed of as having turned infructuous.

infructuous.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J)