Anil Kumar Podar And ANR. v. Reliance Industries Ltd. And 3 Others

NMA 51-15 VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION No. 51 OF 2015 IN APPEAL No. 82 OF 2012 IN CONTEMPT PETITION No. 54 OF 2011 IN DEFAMATION SUIT No. 2077 OF 2008 Anil Kumar Podar & Anr.

...

Applicant Vs.

Reliance Industries Ltd. & Ors.

...

Respondents *** Mr. Chittaranjan Das, for the Applicant.

Mr. Firdosh Pooniwala, Ms. M. D'Souza i/b A. S. Dayal & Associates, for the Respondents.

*** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 PC.

.

No plausible explanation has been given by the Applicant for condoning the delay of 910 days, caused in filing the restoration application. Hence, we are not inclined to grant the prayer for condonation of said delay. In the result, the motion taken out for restoration of the appeal is dismissed and is accordingly disposed. Sd/- Sd/- [Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.] Vinayak Halemath 1 / 2

NMA 51-15 CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Order.

2 / 2