← Library
Bombay High CourtARBP/537/2018disposed off

Yaminee D Manjrekar And Shushama D Manjrekar v. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.

2018-09-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte2 pages

Chittewan 1/2 906.ARBP 537-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.537 OF 2018 Yaminee D. Manjrekar And Others ...

Petitioners

Versus

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.

...

Respondent .....

Mr. Keshav B. Borhade for the Petitioners.

Ms. Ranjita Shinde i/b Mr. Jitendra G. Shukla for the Respondent. .....

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATE : 21 SEPTEMBER 2018 P.C. :

.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

The Petitioners challenge an award passed by a Sole Arbitrator in an Arbitration Reference concerning dues purportedly owed by the Petitioners to the Respondent herein. One of the main grounds of challenge is that the impugned award was passed ex parte without service of the proceedings on the Petitioners.

After the matter was heard at some length, it has been agreed by learned Counsel for both parties that the impugned award may be set aside and the matter may go back to the sole arbitrator, who heard the reference. Accordingly, the impugned award dated 26 September 2015 is quashed and set aside and the arbitration reference is sent back to the sole

Chittewan 2/2 906.ARBP 537-18.doc arbitrator for a fresh hearing in accordance with law. The Respondent herein (original claimant in the arbitration reference) shall supply a complete set of papers and proceedings in the arbitration reference including documents relied upon by the claimant before the sole arbitrator, to the Petitioners herein.

(S.C. GUPTE, J.) by Rajesh Vasant Chittewan Date:

2018.09.26 15:56:00 +0530 Rajesh Vasant Chittewan