← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/265/2022dismissed

Siddharth Jaggu Gaikwad v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And 10 ORS

2023-01-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.265 OF 2022 Sitabai Jaggu Gaikwad (Deceased) .. Petitioner Siddharth Jaggu Gaikwad Vs.

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. D.V. Saroj i/b. Mr. Ashley Cusher for the Petitioner. Ms. Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for State.

Mr. Kunal Waghmare i/b. S.K. Sonawane for MCGM. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.W. CHANDWANI, J.J.

TH JANUARY, 2023.

DATE : 19 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

In Para 2 of this petition, the petitioner has stated that she is filing the present petition being aggrieved by the inaction and failure on the part of Respondent Nos.1 and 5 to perform their statutory duties. The statutory duties expected to be performed by Respondent No.1 and 5 are of initiating action for removal of illegal construction carried out by Respondent Nos.7, 8, 9 and 10 on the property belonging to the petitioner. For such a grievance, it would be necessary for the petitioner to file a civil suit, if so advised, but certainly the petitioner cannot approach this Court 1/2 Digitally signed by AARTI G PALKAR Date:

2023.01.21 12:23:47 +0530 AARTI PALKAR 6.WP.265.2022.doc Palkar

by invoking its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The grievance of the petitioner involves disputed question of facts. In this view of the matter, the petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse by availing of alternate remedy as available in law.

[ M.W. CHANDWANI, J. ] [ SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J. ] 2/2 6.WP.265.2022.doc Palkar