← Library
Bombay High CourtCSP/867/2015scheme sanctioned company

Kinetic Glue Online Communities Pvt. Ltd. v. -

2016-04-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 867 OF 2015 CONNECTED WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO 718 OF 2015 KineticGlue Online Communities Private Limited ....Petitioner Company With COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 868 OF 2015 CONNECTED WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO 719 OF 2015 BMC Software India Private Limited ....Petitioner Company In the matter of Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of KineticGlue Online Communities Private Limited ("Transferor Company") with BMC Software India Private Limited ("Transferee Company") and their respective shareholders Called for hearing Mr. Hemant Sethi, i/b M/s Hemant Sethi & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner Company Mr. P. Khosla i/b Mr. Pankaj Kapoor for Regional Director. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Official Liquidator Present

CORAM: B. P. Colabawalla, J.

DATE: 22nd April, 2016 PC:

1.

Heard counsel for the parties. No objector has come before the court to oppose the Scheme of Amalgamation and nor any party has controverted any averments made in the Petition. 2.

The sanction of the Court is sought under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 to the Scheme of Amalgamation of KineticGlue Online Communities Private Limited ("Transferor Company") with BMC Software India Private Limited ("Transferee Company") and their respective shareholders.

3.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that both the Petitioner Companies are presently engaged in the business of software development and all activities connected with software business. 4.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Scheme will result into following benefits namely that the amalgamation will enable pooling of resources of the companies involved in amalgamation to their common advantage, resulting in more productive utilization of the said resources and achieving economies of scale resulting into cost and operational efficiencies, which would be beneficial for all the stakeholders; the amalgamation would bring synergies in various

fields and facilitate combination of administrative, marketing and financial functions of the entities involved and consequently result into more efficient functioning of the merged entity in a cost effective manner; facilitate inter-unit transfer of resources among different units that would in turn result into operational synergies; the amalgamation would bring greater management focus and would help in achieving uniform corporate policies and faster / effective decision making and its implementation; help avoiding duplication of regulatory and procedural compliances and consequently result into saving of time, resources and cost involved in such compliances; Post amalgamation, the Transferee Company will have better financial and operational prospects and shall be beneficial and in the best interests of the shareholders, creditors, employees of the companies involved and all concerned.

5.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners further states that the Board of Directors of the Petitioner Companies have approved the said Scheme of Amalgamation by passing Board Resolutions which are annexed to the respective Company Scheme Petitions.

6.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners further states that the Petitioner Companies have complied with all the directions passed in the respective Company Summons for Direction and that the

Company Scheme Petitions have been filed in consonance with the orders passed in respective Company Summons for Direction. 7.

The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners has stated that the Petitioner Companies have complied with all requirements as per directions of this Court and they have filed necessary affidavit of compliance in the Court. Moreover, the Petitioner Companies undertakes to comply with all statutory requirements if any, as required under the Companies Act, 1956 / 2013 and rules made there under whichever is applicable. The said undertaking is accepted. 8.

The Regional Director has filed an Affidavit on 21st April, 2016 stating therein, save and except as stated in paragraphs 6 (a) and (b) thereof, it appears that the Scheme is not prejudicial to the interest of shareholders and public. In paragraphs 6 (a) and (b) of the said Affidavit, the Regional Director has stated that:- "6.

That the Deponent further submits that, (a) The shares of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company are held by foreign body corporate and its shareholders. Hence the allotment of new shares to the shareholder of the Transferor Company, the Transferee Company may be directed to comply with FEMA / RBI regulations as applicable in this regard.

(b) That the Deponent further submits that, the Tax issue if any arising out of this scheme shall be subject to final decision of Income Tax Authority and approval of the Scheme by Hon'ble High Court may not deter the Income Tax Authority to scrutinize the tax returns filed by the petitioner company after giving effect to the amalgamation. The decision of the Income Tax Authority is binding on the petitioner company."

9.

As far as observations made in paragraph 6 (a) of Affidavit of the Regional Director is concerned, the Petitioner/Transferee Company through their Counsel undertakes that Petitioner/Transferee Company shall comply with relevant provisions of the FEMA / RBI regulations as may be applicable in this regard. 10.

As far as observations made in paragraph 6 (b) of Affidavit of the Regional Director, the Petitioners clarifies that the approval of the Scheme by this Court will not deter the Income Tax Authority to scrutinize the tax return filed by the Petitioner Companies after giving effect to the Scheme and all issues arising out of the Scheme will be met and answered in accordance with law.

11.

The Learned Counsel for Regional Director on instructions of Mr. M. Chandanamuthu, Joint Director, Legal in the Office of the Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Western Region, Mumbai, states that they are satisfied with the undertakings given by the

Petitioner Companies. The said undertakings given by the Petitioner Companies are accepted.

12.

The Official Liquidator has filed his report on 17th March, 2016 stating therein that the affairs of the Transferor Company have been conducted in a proper manner and that the Transferor Company may be ordered to be dissolved by this Court.

13.

From the material on record, the Scheme appears to be fair and reasonable and is not violative of any provisions of law and is not contrary to public policy.

14.

Since all the requisite statutory compliances have been fulfilled, the Company Scheme Petition No. 867 of 2015 & 868 of 2015 are made absolute in terms of the prayer clause (a) of the respective Company Scheme Petition.

15.

The Petitioner Companies are directed to lodge a copy of this order and Scheme duly authenticated by the Company Registrar, High Court, Bombay, with the concerned Superintendent of Stamps, for the purpose of adjudication of stamp duty payable, if any, on the same within 60 days from the date of receipt of the Order. 16.

Petitioner is directed to file a copy of this order along with a copy of the Scheme with the concerned Registrar of Companies, electronically, along with E-Form INC-28, in addition to physical

copy, as per the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 1956 / 2013, whichever is applicable.

17.

The Petitioners in Company Scheme Petitions No. 867 of 2015 & 868 of 2015 to pay costs of Rs.10,000/- each to the Regional Director, Western Region, Mumbai and Petitioner in Company Scheme Petition No. 867 of 2015 to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay. Costs to be paid within four weeks from today. 18.

Filing and issuance of the drawn up order is dispensed with. 19.

All concerned regulatory authorities to act on a copy of this order along with the Scheme duly authenticated by the Company Registrar, High Court (O. S.), Bombay.

(B. P. Colabawalla, J.) CERTIFICATE I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of the original signed order.

Uploaded By: Shankar Gawde, Stenographer