← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3850/2021disposed off

Mahesh Gunanath Thakoor v. The Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 And 2 ORS

2023-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla2 pages

442 wp3850-21.docx Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date:

2023.08.04 11:15:48 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3850 OF 2021 Mahesh Gunanath Thakoor ..... Petitioner Vs.

The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-20, Mumbai & Ors.

..... Respondents Mr.Mandar Vaidya for Petitioner Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents

CORAM:

K.R. SHRIRAM, J & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.

DATED :

31st JULY 2023 P.C.

1.

Mr. Vaidya states that he is constrained to approach this court impugning Form No.3 dated 29th October 2021 issued by Respondent No.1 because petitioner's declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been rejected due to mismatch in the information related to payment against tax arrears. Mr. Vaidya states that if Respondent No.1 could be directed to give a personal hearing then petitioner should be able to explain and clear doubts regarding mismatch as well as account for the cash that was seized during search operation some years ago. Mohite 1/2

442 wp3850-21.docx 2.

Mr. Sharma states that personal hearing can be granted if the matter can be resolved.

3.

Accordingly, we set aside Form No.3 which is impugned in this petition and direct Respondent No.1 to reconsider petitioner's declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by granting personal hearing to petitioner. The notice for personal hearing shall be given atleast seven working days in advance. After personal hearing is granted, Respondent No.1 may issue revised Form No.3.

4.

We clarify that we have not made any observations on the merits of the case.

5.

Petition disposed.

(FIRDOSH P.POONIWALLA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Mohite 2/2