Sanjay Vyanktesh Ruikar And Shubhada Sanjay Ruikar v. Victoria Enterprises Limited And ANR

s 63 of 2015 (910).sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.63 OF 2015 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.185 OF 2015 Sanjay Vyanktesh Ruikar and Anr.

...

Plaintiffs versus Victoria Enterprises Ltd. and Anr.

...

Defendants Mr. Dinyar Madon, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Kanade, Ms. Gauri Mehta i/by M/s. L.J.Law, for Plaintiffs.

Mr. B.M.Zaveri, for Defendants.

CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATE: 27 th APRIL, 2017 P.C.:

1.

The learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs states that he is not pressing the Suit against Defendant No.2. The Suit against Defendant No.2 is therefore, disposed of as not pressed.

2.

The learned Advocates appearing for the Plaintiffs and Defendant No.1 have now tendered Consent Terms dated 27th April, 2017. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken on record and the above Suit be decreed in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the Plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and Director of Defendant No.1. The learned Advocates for the parties have also signed the Consent Terms. The undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted. ssp 1/2

s 63 of 2015 (910).sxw The Suit is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms, marked 'X'

. Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per rules. Notice of Motion No.185 of 2015 also stands disposed of. Though the Suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms, the parties shall comply with clauses 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 10 of the Consent Terms. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) ssp 2/2