Raymond Ltd (Textile Division) v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise Mumbai -Iii

(9)-CEXA-16-12.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Digitally signed by Balaji G.

Panchal Date:

2021.01.20 15:04:48 +0530 Balaji G.

Panchal CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.16 OF 2012 Raymond Limited (Textile Division) ..Appellant

Versus

Commissioner of Central Excise ..Respondent Ms. Ginita Bodani i/by ELP, for the Appellant. Mr. J. B. Mishra, for the Respondent.

CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2021 P.C.

Heard Ms. Ginita Bodani, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. J. B. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent. 2.

This appeal has been preferred by the appellant under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 08.09.2011 /19.10.2011 of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai.

3.

The appeal was admitted by this Court on 08.02.2012 on the substantial questions of law framed in the said order. 4.

Today, the appeal is before us on praecipe filed by learned counsel for the appellant.

5.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has BGP.

(9)-CEXA-16-12.doc.

sought for settlement and accordingly has made a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Therefore she prays for withdrawal of the appeal.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made.

7.

In that view of the matter, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. 8.

Accordingly, appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 9.

Refund as per rules.

10.

this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a MILIND N. JADHAV, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J BGP.