Indusind Bank Limited v. Tarun Polymers And 2 ORS.

8-ARBP8-2020.DOC Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 8 OF 2020 Indusind Bank Limited

...Petitioner

Versus

Tarun Polymers & Ors

...Respondents

Ms Sunitha Perumal, with Ms Archana Bhasare, i/b Sachin Masurkar, for the Petitioner.

None for the Respondents.

CORAM:

G.S. PATEL, J.

DATED:

3rd March 2020 PC:- 1.

The Respondents are absent. They have not complied with the order of 5th February 2020. They have been served. 2.

In that view of the matter, the order of 5th February 2020 is confirmed as the order in this Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.

3.

I had granted an injunction and made an order of disclosure in terms of prayer clause (b). This order is confirmed as the final order in the Petition.

3rd March 2020

8-ARBP8-2020.DOC 4.

Liberty to the Petitioners to press for the remaining reliefs before the arbitral tribunal in the ensuing arbitration. 5.

The Petitioners are further at liberty to have their Application under Section 11, when filed, circulated for an early listing. 6.

The Arbitration Petition is disposed of in these terms. No costs.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 3rd March 2020